Bulldozer hauling away destroyed oaks by HW 101 |
Surely it sounds overly dramatic to
say, as I did at the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors meeting this
morning, that the chain saws cutting down the oak trees and the bulldozers
dragging them away feel like an invasion of the Nazi army.
And yet it’s true. I’ve often wondered how Jews and their allies
felt watching the goose-stepping invaders, knowing that the clop-clop-clop of
their boots, along with the ever tightening restrictions of their laws, and the
power of their guns and hatred, could only bode horrendous evil.
So, too, the onslaught of CalTrans, with
the power and money that support the bypass, seem to march over the voices of
those people with a more reasoned vision for an alternative.
The Board of Supervisors meeting was
called because two of the Board Members, Dan Hamburg and John Pinches, had
prepared a letter of support from the Board to CalTrans for the bypass,
insisting that the protesters represent a fringe element of the Willits
community.
Kim speaking at the Mendocino Board of Supervisors Meeting |
In fact, the Board meeting was
packed with community members, 55 of whom spoke in their allotted 3
minute segments to explain why the bypass is a bad idea. ONLY ONE PERSON spoke
in favor of the bypass; he was from the Mendocino County Organization of
Governments, which had voted to spend $54 million of their money to support the
bypass.
For over three hours, the rest of us
who stood up and spoke represented an amazing array of perspectives. We heard
about the environmental problems that will result from the construction of the
bypass, including the analysis of one author who researches oak trees and reported that
over 300 species intersect with oak environments like this one which was
being cut down as we spoke.
We heard about the psychological
impacts of this division on the community. Local business people warned of the negative
impact on commerce. A 13-year-old girl spoke to the legal violations of a board
of supervisors that is not adequately protecting the interests of the people
who have elected them.
Residents of Willits for over two
decades revealed the many ways that the community has offered alternatives to
the now-initiated bypass, all of which were consistently disregarded in favor
of the current plan. They shed light on the history of this conflict,
indicating how many of the arguments—even of our supervisor Pinches—can be
reduced to a “he said, she said” battle of misrepresentation and lies.
Many Willits residents complained
that the town has been hoodwinked in various ways throughout this process. For
example, I learned that the original plan called for a four-lane bypass,
allowing for some safety measures should traffic stall along the four-mile
viaduct. That plan, however, was deemed to have too much of a negative environmental
impact on the wetlands that would be drained to provide its “footprint.” The
community thought that theisviaduct plan was dashed. However, a two-lane
alternative replaced the four-lane scheme, and because “someone” deemed it was
more viable, then the two-lanes were accepted.
Police blocking access to Warbler in her tree |
Notice my use of the passive voice.
As I’ve said before, I’m still trying to figure this all out myself. In fact,
the gist of my own 3-minute talk was to speak to why so many Willits people
are, ONLY NOW, responding in protest to this bypass, for I’ve talked to those
both in favor of the bypass and those who have had no opinion who say, “Why are
they complaining now? We knew this was going to happen.” But what did we really
know? I certainly had no idea.
To the assembled supervisors and
public, I said, “I’ve had property here for 25 years, and over the years, whenever
I asked people about what they thought about the bypass, they said, ‘Oh, it’s
so controversial, it’ll never happen.’ So people like me remained ignorant and
complacent. But when Warbler went up a tree to protest the bypass, she brought
attention to the horrors of this plan that we had not known. And we’ve woken
up.”
I believe, however, that the
pro-bypass contingent is counting on the rest of us being ignorant. Once those
of us start talking to everyone we know about some of the impacts of the
bypass, they, too, express surprise. For example, one of the biggest
communities within Willits is the Brooktrails neighborhood, which I go through
to get to my own little dirt road community at the north end of town. But there
will be only two planned off/on ramps for Willits, one at the very south end
where Warbler sits in her tree, and another at the complete opposite end of
town, far beyond the turn off for Brooktrails. So that means most Brooktrails
residents are likely to go all the way through town to get to their turn off,
rather than use the bypass anyhow. So what good is the bypass in that
situation?
Similarly, a good 30% of traffic
coming into town is heading for Highway 20 to get to the Mendocino coast. They
will still come most of the way into town and contribute to the infamous “bottleneck”
at the Safeway just before the Highway 20 turn off.
It’s complicated. And you see, the
bypass as instigated does not resolve many of the problems that the Willits
community experiences.
Many speakers at the meeting
mentioned the Old Railroad Route, the alternative that would have little impact
on the community because it’s already a four-lane “road” for the no-longer used
railroad, and it can be used as an alternative route for cars and trucks that
do not want to get caught up in Main Street traffic. The estimates for building
this route came in at $30 million, compared to the $300 million for the
CalTrans route—and realistically speaking, that plan will cost $400 million
before the six years of construction are over.
Why was this community-proposed and
supported “railroad route” alternative ignored? I keep asking and find no good
responses. I must find out.
When I left the Board of Supervisors
meeting, I came back through the Highway 101 site where Warbler bravely
continues to sit in her tree after CalTrans put in a fence and the police
started blocking any access to her tree sit. They are waiting for her to get
too thirsty and hungry to stay in her tree any longer.
On right, officer leading away arrestee on right |
While I watched, the police arrested
four more protestors who got in the way of the chainsaws and bulldozers.
HW 101 south of Willits with police and tree cutting to right |
The website for Save Our Little Lake
Valley also has more photos and information:
http://www.savelittlelakevalley.org/
These are a few photos of the oak
grove that will be cut down to pave the bypass.
Oak grove slated for destruction |
One person commenting on my blog
suggested that we all enjoy the opportunities that modern transportation have
provided us by driving on freeways all the time, and so Willits is going to
join modern society and enjoy progress with its own bypass. How interesting
that San Francisco decided to destroy its 101 bypass, the Embarcadero Freeway,
when the city realized that the freeway was destroying its way of life. Surely
we pay a price for progress, but this is not the price that so many Willits
residents want—and the more they learn, the less they want it, with now 1800
petitions signed to prevent the bypass in a town of 5000.
Supervisor John Pinches claimed at
the meeting that the bypass is now “a done deal.” The protestors continue to
believe that Goliath can be stopped, especially as more and more people begin
to understand the implications of what the cement viaduct will impose on the
valley. Ignorance is no excuse for injustice and stupidity.
Is there anything good coming out of the project? Will there be any new trees to offset the ones being cut down? I wonder if there is a reason that the approving agencies like fish and game and army corps have not tried to stop this project if it is truely such a native impact? It seems to me, that we generally need to weigh the pros and the cons before we condem. I don't believe that I've seen any of the pros posted on this site or the other site?
ReplyDeleteThanks for writing. Since you know about the Army Corps and their role in this, perhaps you could state their position. I've noted in earlier posts that a couple of points on the pro-bypass side: 1) to reduce pollution of idling cars and trucks coming through Main Street when there is a high volume of traffic; 2) to reduce wait time as traffic moves through town. I will also note that one man who stopped by the tree sit reported that he's in support of the bypass because "my son needs work." That is, he is equating the $300 million project as providing some trickle down work to his son.
ReplyDeleteI do try to acknowledge the other side, but I don't pretend to be an "objective" reporter. If Pinches is right and the bypass is a "done deal," then the other side and its $300 million plus dollars has enough voice and power speaking for it. Even the 55 voices at the Board meeting yesterday speaking for the cons did not outweigh those who are in favor. So I'm providing a voice for those whose voices have somehow been drowned out in this process. Why haven't the alternatives been heard and valued? Do you know?
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Delete